Wednesday, January 05, 2005
Death, destruction, and disease.
The world's most powerful earthquake in forty years struck on December 27, 2004, deep under the Indian Ocean, setting off the most devastating series of tsunami in recent memory. Walls of water dismantled homes and churches and businesses and livelihoods like tissue paper, while smothering and crushing hundreds of thousands of people. All that's left now are scenes of utter depravity and inhuman pain, like something out of a Ridley Scott movie.
Here in middle-class Southern Black suburbia, few people can say that they've lived through something so naturally heinous. Sure, every few years a hurricane or four comes through and demolishes a couple of homes, but the level of complete annihilation witnessed by the South Asian tsunami victims emerge unparalleled by modern human terms.
But we don't care, because the victims aren't white.
Now, at this point, some of you are thinking, "Dammit, can't he leave race out of this! This is a humanitarian crisis of biblical proportions happening clear across the world. Doesn't he have the simple human decency to leave race alone for once!?!"
Nope. Sorry.
I laughed openly at Spielberg's Amistad; I'm not gonna turn off my brain to soothe your pathetic Western guilt. Days ago, when the first information about the natural calamity reached the airways as the waves crashed, the first stories discussed tormented white tourists inconvenienced by the roiling waves. Images of young Hannes Bergstroem, aged eighteen months, played continuously on Live at CNN days after the event, creating massive, chaotic, wide-angled shots of devastated dark-skinned South Asians in areas like heavily Muslim Indonesia running from impending doom or strewn about the shattered infrastructure like so many colored toothpicks awaiting a cleaning order in writing and a strong broom held by some graying bent-backed Negro trustee clad in a gleaming light blue United Nations uniform. I don't give a damn about lost supermodels or dead Nordic tourists anymore than the hundreds of thousands killed and wounded for the sad happenstance of living in the wrong poor countries at the wrong time.
Our international media sought out images and stories from rich white tourists in order to provide their clients, the uninformed public, easily identifiable human victims and survivors for your viewing pleasure. As always, the unspoken inference is as follows - The only important deaths happen to white people. In order to be concerned about global hardship, white people have to be involved. The angered waters of the Boxing Day Tsunami wash clean Frantz Fanon's wretched of the earth, poor, starving, naked and subsisting; for the liberal American television viewer they are still nothing more than George Orwell's "undifferentiated brown stuff" from 1953's Marrakech, undeserved of anything more than a couple of words of insincere solace and token pennies for rebuilding from the wealthy Western white world.
And President George W. Bush didn't want to give that! Coming under severe fire for his perceived coldness to the victims of the tsunamis, Bush dispatches brother Jeb and everyone's favorite Uncle, Colin Powell , to the scene. America was willing to watch CNN and feel false empathy for the suffering people, and then change the channel to Desperate Housewives and forget all about the rising butcher's bill, but today, I read that roughly $3 billion dollars in aid have been amassed to assist the struggling region. So, I have some questions for you, dear readers.
Given the recent earthquake and tsunamis in Southeast Asia and the worldwide humanitarian response to these natural disasters, I wonder, is it possible to have a reasonable financial response from the world's wealthiest nations to such a crisis? How much money is enough money to deal with sudden death and destruction on such a massive scale?
Are you pleased with the United States' current levels of pledged aid? Do you believe that Americans can and should do more, or that the Bush Administration was pulled kicking and screaming into having to care at all about the widespread death and destruction of the past few days?
Lastly, have you given personally? Is your decadent white guilt satisfied? Did CNN Sandra Bullock your wallet open?
Your comments, as always, are appreciated.
The world's most powerful earthquake in forty years struck on December 27, 2004, deep under the Indian Ocean, setting off the most devastating series of tsunami in recent memory. Walls of water dismantled homes and churches and businesses and livelihoods like tissue paper, while smothering and crushing hundreds of thousands of people. All that's left now are scenes of utter depravity and inhuman pain, like something out of a Ridley Scott movie.
Here in middle-class Southern Black suburbia, few people can say that they've lived through something so naturally heinous. Sure, every few years a hurricane or four comes through and demolishes a couple of homes, but the level of complete annihilation witnessed by the South Asian tsunami victims emerge unparalleled by modern human terms.
But we don't care, because the victims aren't white.
Now, at this point, some of you are thinking, "Dammit, can't he leave race out of this! This is a humanitarian crisis of biblical proportions happening clear across the world. Doesn't he have the simple human decency to leave race alone for once!?!"
Nope. Sorry.
I laughed openly at Spielberg's Amistad; I'm not gonna turn off my brain to soothe your pathetic Western guilt. Days ago, when the first information about the natural calamity reached the airways as the waves crashed, the first stories discussed tormented white tourists inconvenienced by the roiling waves. Images of young Hannes Bergstroem, aged eighteen months, played continuously on Live at CNN days after the event, creating massive, chaotic, wide-angled shots of devastated dark-skinned South Asians in areas like heavily Muslim Indonesia running from impending doom or strewn about the shattered infrastructure like so many colored toothpicks awaiting a cleaning order in writing and a strong broom held by some graying bent-backed Negro trustee clad in a gleaming light blue United Nations uniform. I don't give a damn about lost supermodels or dead Nordic tourists anymore than the hundreds of thousands killed and wounded for the sad happenstance of living in the wrong poor countries at the wrong time.
Our international media sought out images and stories from rich white tourists in order to provide their clients, the uninformed public, easily identifiable human victims and survivors for your viewing pleasure. As always, the unspoken inference is as follows - The only important deaths happen to white people. In order to be concerned about global hardship, white people have to be involved. The angered waters of the Boxing Day Tsunami wash clean Frantz Fanon's wretched of the earth, poor, starving, naked and subsisting; for the liberal American television viewer they are still nothing more than George Orwell's "undifferentiated brown stuff" from 1953's Marrakech, undeserved of anything more than a couple of words of insincere solace and token pennies for rebuilding from the wealthy Western white world.
And President George W. Bush didn't want to give that! Coming under severe fire for his perceived coldness to the victims of the tsunamis, Bush dispatches brother Jeb and everyone's favorite Uncle, Colin Powell , to the scene. America was willing to watch CNN and feel false empathy for the suffering people, and then change the channel to Desperate Housewives and forget all about the rising butcher's bill, but today, I read that roughly $3 billion dollars in aid have been amassed to assist the struggling region. So, I have some questions for you, dear readers.
Given the recent earthquake and tsunamis in Southeast Asia and the worldwide humanitarian response to these natural disasters, I wonder, is it possible to have a reasonable financial response from the world's wealthiest nations to such a crisis? How much money is enough money to deal with sudden death and destruction on such a massive scale?
Are you pleased with the United States' current levels of pledged aid? Do you believe that Americans can and should do more, or that the Bush Administration was pulled kicking and screaming into having to care at all about the widespread death and destruction of the past few days?
Lastly, have you given personally? Is your decadent white guilt satisfied? Did CNN Sandra Bullock your wallet open?
Your comments, as always, are appreciated.

5 Comments:
At 1/05/2005 04:15:00 PM, Jenn said:;
Heeeeey... *I* gave. And it wasn't to satisfy no white guilt. It was all I could give, and it was because some 150,000 people got wiped off the damn planet!!
*stares pointedly*
At 1/09/2005 11:59:00 PM, Anonymous said:;
The tsunami just proved that helping poor countries can become a worldwide effort. Billions of dollars have been donated to help these countries get back on their feet. Hence, there should be no excuses to why 12 million people starve to death or die of lack of food. There should be no excuses to why people die due to contaminated water bore with diseases and chemicals. I feel the United States stepped up and donated because we dont need anymore countries hating us. Its sad that it takes hundreds of thousands of people to parish in order for people to reach into their pockets and give. Look at the 9/11 attacks, the Red Cross stopped taking donated blood and now look, we are in a shortage of blood donations again. I dont know about you, but they call me every month to donate. Furthermore, what troubled me was that the Red Cross stopped taking donations of clothes because they didnot have the storage to hold donated items. Storage facilities can be arranged and those clothes can be given to other countries who suffer every single day. Hopefully we all will learn that waiting for disasters to occur is not the answer to solving world problems. "Mutual Coercion, Mutally Agreed Upon" needs to be shouted from the mountain tops.
At 11/26/2006 03:37:00 AM, Anonymous said:;
Well done!
[url=http://ixjyiprt.com/vqhw/uoeo.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://uytlfbdb.com/ywfn/rksj.html]Cool site[/url]
At 11/26/2006 03:37:00 AM, Anonymous said:;
Good design!
My homepage | Please visit
At 11/26/2006 03:37:00 AM, Anonymous said:;
Good design!
http://ixjyiprt.com/vqhw/uoeo.html | http://qncljmfd.com/wsnh/knqc.html
Post a Comment