Tuesday, January 25, 2005

The Unwanted

To scream one requires an audience. Effective communication of personal desire needs the dissonant soundwaves of frantic rage to submit to one's commanding directives for order and sensibility; in essence, for people to listen to your good sense your mind must first make sense. Today I've struggled to make sense of my life, and learned that no one is listening.

Today was a day filled mostly with second season episodes of The West Wing. I've reread some of Will Kylimicka's Multicultural Citizenship and compiled notes of the overview chapter of The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche to write my comic script, Superman: Ubermensch. Concentration eludes me. I'd like to believe that this writing will one day soon better my condition, but I've never been one for irrational hope, or blind optimism. No, I live as a man without faith, a disbeliever in the evidence of things not seen, by choice a hopeless heretic harried by helter-skelter humanity. Usually, this innate cynicism serves me well, prevents subscription to popular simple explanations of complex sociopolitical interaction. Today I'm paralyzed.

The situation: soon after the beginning of this new calendar year, Angel and I received 'save-the-date' notices of the upcoming nuptials of two of our friends, Angel's high school pal Gingerale, and my pre-Cornell friend Deidra. Needless to say, these happy events prompted abundant smiles and well-wishes from us, even though we know that people will continue to ask when Angel and I plan to follow suit. The answer? No time soon. On the real, people would be lucky to see me married before I'm thirty-five, if ever. I love Angel, with all my heart and soul. Too bad that doesn't matter in the slightest. Marriage is pain. To love is to suffer, and to marry your love is suicidal. You should know better. I've watched my parents argue about everything possible for the entirety of my short life. Every time I return to Virginia, I become the unwitting subject of their arguments whether I waste their money without sensible contribution or promote a counter-balancing aggressiveness detrimental to their household. My parents always argue, because marriage is about argument. Anything else isn't true love, and not worth the joint-filing tax benefits.

Deidra-s marriage in McKinney, TX to Mr. Keven Morris will occur on May 21, 2005 and Gingerale's wedding to Pierre Duez happens a week prior on May 14th in Singhampton, Ontario. Angel and I responded to both save-the-dates with eager happiness. Weddings are wonderful events, filled with smiling happy people, and I missed my friends Xander and Willow's wedding so I promised myself that I'd be financially stable enough to attend these pre-scheduled initial moments of holy matrimony. My generation is growing up quicker than I expected, but with a world filled with terrorist threats of dirty nuclear bombs, Ashley Simpson live concerts and Secretary Rumsfeld's private international Metal Gear Solid 3 covert-ops unit, childhood no longer remains a luxury we can afford.

Now, in our lives, I have never met or spoken to Gingerale, and Angel has never met or spoken to Deidra, yet Deidra addressed her notification to both Angel and myself while Gingerale addressed her notification to Angel alone. Both women have held prior knowledge of my relationship to Angel for some time. In response, Jenn and I composed thank you letters to both women for their notifications. On the letter to Gingerale, however, Angel added a curious interrogative, asking whether it would be alright with the happy couple if I accompanied Angel to their wedding. Now I have next-to-zero experience with weddings, but the couple I've attended in my life have been fairly sizable affairs, held in Southern Black churches, where people were happy to accompany others, whether or not the formal protocol of an RSVP had been signed, sealed, and delivered to the happy couple's publicist or wedding coordinator. I know not how other cultures handle this stuff; recently when Angel attended her cousin's wedding with her sister and mother, she drove down and had a wonderful time. I don't believe her presence was heralded in Pinyin calligraphy, but whatever. The point is that I questioned the necessity of asking Gingerale's permission to bring me. Angel thought it necessary at the time to prevent planning snafus, in case reception seating numbers were thrown off by my accompaniment. I tossed my quizzical countenance aside, and moved on. Angel and I responded, and had a pretty good night together, watching reality television and doing other couple stuff.

Of course, the differences in address were not invisible to my perspective; part of me felt at the time that Angel was needlessly reminding her friends of my relationship to her. Gingerale and Pierre have known for some time that Angel and I have been dating and living together. Honestly, her excuse about reception seating sounded at that time like a weak, flimsy reason to ask someone else's permission to allow my attendance. Angel's request bothered me. She could have written a response that simply assumed that I would join her and fulfill the notification issue completely. "Gingerale, thank you so much for the notification, and congratulations on your upcoming marriage to Pierre. James and I wouldn't miss your wedding for the world! Keep us posted on logistical issues, and again, congrats!" No, Angel's statement included something to the effect of "Would you all mind terribly if..." or "Would it be alright if James also attended..." or "Is it ok if James came along ...", like I'm some annoying little puppy that can never be left alone for extended periods of time without annoying puddles of yellow urine on the carpet and chewed up shoes in the closet, but has no place, given an utter lack of home training, at any formal gathering, much less a life-altering perfectionist's event like a wedding.

I felt the question alone belittled me, reduced me to unnecessary baggage at best or at worst, a dirty, disgusting Golem best kept segregated, incarcerated, secret from the affairs of honorable men. I had to tell myself that it didn't matter, that the foci of the happiness were the weddings, and I shouldn't allow myself to wallow in petty interpretations of simple correspondence. I focused on meeting the one woman from my girlfriend's past with whom she possessed the most mysterious and misunderstood relationship, filled with teenage angst, Gothic pretension, female drama, adolescent teasing, and unresolved tension. I never understood Angel's friends; whether so overbearingly, obnoxiously effeminate to the point of Carson Kressly Queer Eye for the Straight Guy parody or so hypersocially apolitical Lucy Liu resembles Michelle Malkin, Angel's Torontoians were always people I thought she should keep in touch with, if only for the nostalgic camaraderie of talking with people who already 'get' you. I'll be honest - after five years in the biz, I still don't 'get' Angel; her daily surprises still astound the eye and confuse the understanding. Frankly, I relied on those who grew up with me to endure some of the rough spots Cornell University provided me; without the Squad, I doubt I'd have made it. I didn't understand Angel's obvious reluctance to keep in contact with her old friends, but I still feel that Gingerale's interaction had something to do with the frozen contact. Now that my Squad is dead and buried, a deceased union no longer politically viable or personally prudent, I find Angel's reaction obvious: a person trying to make a new start needs no tethers to an unforgiving past. Gingerale and Angel are both friendly competition and antagonistic competitors; whatever the source of their tension, it was enough to prevent any movement on Angel's part to seek out Gingerale for further contact once her collegiate years emerged, a raucous silence ever-widening their lacerated friendship.

What's past is prologue, they say. After we sent our response to Gingerale, my hope was to test my theories concerning Angel's interaction with her at her wedding. Last weekend, Angel and I received our response.


11 January 2005

Dear Angel,

The Save-the-Date was exactly that - a reminder for all our out-of-town friends that need to make travel arrangements; we will be sending formal invitations later. We are afraid, however, that the invitation was intended for you alone - we are trying to keep the wedding/ reception small, and both of us have a significant number of extended family members that must be invited. We hope that this won't prevent you from coming; it would be lovely to see you again.

All the best for the new year,

Gingerale.


To be honest, I really didn't know how to take this. I was being told that my presence at this most perfect of possible days was not now, nor had ever been, required or encouraged. Basically, I should keep my ass at home. Angel was immediately irate, but I told her without hesitation that she should attend the wedding, that there's no reason that she shouldn't go and have a good time there even if I wasn't invited. I suppose that should have been the end of it; further discussion averted by my uncharacteristically cool nonchalance concerning her friend's "please come alone" regulation. But I simply couldn't push the issue out of my mind. Paralyzed, frozen, disappointed, distant, I couldn't discern why Gingerale would decree such an obvious rejection. She didn't want me there; all that stuff on keeping the affair small seemed a small, minor excuse for another more pressing concern with my attendance. She doesn't know me; I refuse to presuppose a racial concern, but I am a tad weary with being told I have no place around Angel's friends and family. Frankly, I'm left confused. Given that she really doesn't know me and we've never met, what is the point of her written ostracism? Am I really so unwanted?

I've read Gingerale's blog for the last year and a half, at least; keeping up with the thoughts of this friend of Angel's seemed sensible if only to understand Angel's perspective and personal history better. I doubt I've been successful. Gingerale's writing strikes me as needlessly pretentious and faux artistic, the minuscule ravings of a short, forgettable, bland writer who wears horn-rimmed black spectacles with matching chopsticks clad with orange pseudo-Oriental printing as hair accessories while typing furiously into her Sony Vaio some ardently artsy deconstruction of Milton's Paradise Lost, who sips mint tea with ginger in a smoky college-town coffee shop called Stella's or Buster's or Ezra's, filled to capacity with thirty other literature majors all hell-bent upon individual distinction through personal quirkiness and outward counterculture fashion choice yet plainly identifies as uniform post-suburbanite trust fund beneficiaries as they pen droll, uninspired theses on the same three Joan Didion essays in Slouching Through Bethlehem while they overuse the same Max Factor rouge monotone and Clairol midnight black lipstick and as they wear nigh-identical pleated black schoolgirl skirts from Hot Topic and bleached white tank-top shirts under Clorox white frilly Euro-trash blouses from La Chateau to reach with slow, deliberate, background studio audience daytime television grace inside dark Emily the Strange handbags for the cutesy handkerchiefs and scarves picked up at bargains from the local hemp store. You can check for yourself.

Still, my confusion endured. Of course, Rei Ayanami would expect me to indulge in what she terms my penchant for "racial paranoia", but without a first-contact scenario I'm reluctant to make that assertion. It could be anything - jealous prevention of any other appearance of a long-term relationship amongst her friends outside of her own on her wedding day, an anti-Angel assertion of dominance to prevent her from arriving with backup in case any tension between the two emerges, even a simple truth that space really is at a premium. Sadly, my past experiences with Angel's family and friends will not allow me a moment's peace. My mind wanders; the real reason for my requested absence could be that Gingerale never wanted a militant Black man to appear amongst her family and friends arm-in-arm with one of her lifelong Chinese-Canadian female friends. In real-time, full audio/ visual imagery, open for personal one-on-one interaction, Angel and I could intermingle with all the other wedding guests, in-your-face human examples of the ebony midnight of Asian female outmarriage into interracial relationships. The relevant point here is that I don't honestly know what her motivations are in asking Angel to attend her wedding alone, but I don't believe that her excuse about 'space considerations' provides full disclosure about any real issues with my attendance. Maybe I simply do not trust Gingerale anymore than she trusts me. We've never met; do not know each other. At this point I doubt we'll have the opportunity to alter that status quo.

It shouldn't matter to me, I know. I should not be offended. Or bothered. Or irritated. It just pisses me off, frankly. Too many times in the five years I've loved Angel have people from her past deemed me, both directly through confrontation or indirectly through secret discussion and quiet disapproval, inadequate and insufficient of Angelic affection, and derided me as wholly undeserved of her heavenly love. I've come to realize through bitter tears and dehumanizing sacrifice that I will never stand as 'good enough' and appear as worthwhile to the vast majority of Angel's extended family and personal friends. Angel's parents look upon me as a nigger, the lowest form of quasi-humanoid brute, the criminal, aggressive, coarse Black savage more likely to rob than read, more likely to rape than write. I am no more the athletic Supermasculine Menial than I am the dirty urban crack fiend armed with spasmodic switchblade and amphetamine adrenaline in the abysmal darkness of metropolitan alleyways. No academic achievement, no persuasive argument, no psychological assessment, no personal recommendation will change this obvious and uncompromising fact. If Gingerale agrees with this assessment, that is unfortunate. I don't believe she needs to in order to justify barring my arrival at her wedding. It's her day; she can assemble who she wants.

Still, it is quite difficult for me to interpret this as anything less than another amorphous, transparent, completely unopposed anti-nigger episode. I really don't want to, and I'd probably shrug off this entire refusal of my presence if Angel had not asked Gingerale's permission to allow me to escort her to the wedding in the first place. I feel that Angel either knew or suspected that there was a possibility that I was not welcome in Singhampton, Ontario during the May 14th 2005 weekend. It's unnerving; I second-guess Angel's immediate anger towards the note, re-interpret her vitriolic flash as too easily satiated by my easygoing, mild-mannered initial support of her attendance at Gingerale's wedding, wonder quietly if I was simply playing the requisite 'supportive boyfriend amidst unconquerable racism' role, simmer in stereotypical silence so typecast as the brooding, furious 'angry Black male' I'm eligible for confessional close-ups on MTV's The Real World. Angel did not seriously share with me the possibility that Gingerale would refuse my presence, perhaps because she never believed it possible, perhaps because she feared what would be my irate questions protesting such an event. Now that the event has occurred, I find myself oddly sobered. My mother always told me to never go where I was not wanted, but what I have learned so far in my brief and moderately eventful life is that to travel anywhere one desires, one must travel where one is not welcome. My short lifetime includes several examples of boldly going where no one would rather I visit. I have lived with Angel for years; every minute here I reside where I am publicly repugnant. My graduation weekend from Cornell University involved several instances where my presence within the warm amber confines of Angel's innocent love caused public strife and personal dissonance. My life is a journey of the unwanted.

Gingerale's wedding is just another example, just another painted wooden sign warning "No Dogs, No Jews, No Niggers!" in the segregated North American backwaters of my atheistic, liberal, college-educated, terror-stricken, "Vote or Die", Pimp My Ride slogan-fed generation. Cultural diversity and multicultural tolerance can not exist within modern Western liberal democracies as long as individual citizens are both unwilling and unlikely to question their own prejudices and attitudes toward the various racial, ethnic, national, religious, gendered, and sexual identities they encounter in fellow citizens, and within themselves. There is no monolithic mainstream within a modern Western liberal democracy. At best, minority multiplicity ricochets individuals into each other, pinballing increased conflict and catastrophic crises until cooperation and compromise allow combatant citizens short respite until the next anarchist's paradise. Pretend not, dear readers, today's capitalist-imperialist public order has not evolved Western civilization beyond the Hobbesian acid trip; under the Leviathan George W. Bush, John Q. American still endures a solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short existence, supplemented only by iPods, American Idol, and blockbuster remakes from Ron Howard and Tom Hanks.

My war for this world is as yet incomplete. Even though I've found someone to love who loves me back, I feel shamed by the illogical inadequacy imposed upon my person every time our connection emerges before her family and friends. I always end up wrinkled and degraded, pissed upon by racial uncertainty's acid rain, left alone by personal distrust and public hate. I should never have let this damnable note bother me.

posted by James | 7:38 PM | permalink

14 Comments:

  • At 1/26/2005 05:55:00 AM, phillyjay said:;

    Have you talked to anyone else about this?You could be over reacting about not being invited, but I don't know what to say about the family situation.

     
  • At 1/26/2005 06:30:00 AM, James said:;

    I honestly don't know if I'm overreacting, PhillyJay. I could be. That's the worst part - I don't know the real reason, but every instinct abou the situation screams at me to reject Gingerale's excuse about space. When Angel goes to the wedding, she will probably run into mutual friends of Gingerale's who have brought their sig. others, and I wonder how that will affect Angel.

    Basically, Angel and I have dealt too much with the concept of hiding me around her family and friends (against my judgement and will) and every time I percieve that happening again, I bristle. Tell me, do you think I'm just being paranoid? I don't doubt that it's possible; all I'm sure of is that I can't tell anymore.

     
  • At 1/26/2005 08:45:00 AM, phillyjay said:;

    Well, maybe you are a little(just a little) paranoid about the whole thing.However,I can't blame you for feeling that way sometimes since you say you had to deal with that problem before.Maybe you can try to cool out for a little while and see if the problem still effects you later on, then talk about it.

     
  • At 1/26/2005 10:20:00 AM, Jenn said:;

    yeah, uhm, i didn't know you were that mad at me for asking the way i did. i didn't mean to somehow imply that i knew she would say no.

    i really tried to be tactful because i didn't want to assume that the wedding was going to be big.

    i've only been to a few weddings, all in the overtly caucasoid style. anthony's wedding was actually pretty small (they didn't even have any damn chairs you could sit on to watch the ceremony take place). i couldn't see a damn thing, me being vertically challenged and more concerned about my boobs falling out of my dress.

    anyways, the reason i asked was 'cuz of the reception. at anthony's wedding they had little placecards and stuff, so because the name was addressed only to me, i wasn't sure if they had like made seating arrangements or if they had already reached max capacity or something.

    i honestly didn't expect the response i go though. i just sorta assumed that they had forgotten or were trying not to accidentally invite you in case we had split up and they didn't know...

    i dunno... i just didn't know you felt like all this. i didn't mean to hurt your feelings... i'm really sorry...

     
  • At 1/26/2005 03:40:00 PM, Anonymous said:;

    First off, just in case you were thinking about it, J: if you go to Diedra's wedding, don't use that third paragraph as your toast.

    As I was reading your description of getting Gingerale's initial wedding invitation, I thought you were overreacting to your name's omission - and definitely thought you were overreacting to Jenn's response. I've attended a couple weddings in the past few months, and believe me: people planning weddings are busy. Very busy. If they're making up a big guest list and don't write down everyone under the sun *and* his brother (or "a brother," as the case may be), it's not surprising, and it's certainly forgivable.

    Jenn's response was the right one. It would be rude to write back asserting that a previously-unmentioned guest will be present, and worse to show up with someone without giving the event-planners a chance to make a placecard or tell the caterers to bring one more serving of prime rib.

    Then I got to the "no, please leave the help at home" note. Weddings are a time to be with loved ones - even for the guests. Now, you two aren't married or conjoined in some freak medical phenomenon, but if Gingerale is aware of the level of your 5-year cohabitational interdependence, then anyone who wants to claim she's in the right can eat my ass.

    If you know Jane Smith has a "guest," you don't invite Jane Smith unless you're willing to accomodate "Jane Smith and guest." If you don't want her there badly enough to spring for two plates of sub-par beef, you shouldn't be inviting her in the first place.

    If it's worse than overlooking this rather obvious point of etiquette, then, of course, I would extend my previous offer to Gingerale herself.

    -Karlos

     
  • At 1/26/2005 10:39:00 PM, William said:;

    Wow, dude. I finally hunker down and read one of these epics, and this is what i get?!! This was a doozy. That chick is a bitch. In the beginning, I thought, "He's overreacting." 'Cause I felt, even though the thing wasn't addressed to you, you could still go as "guest". But then that bitch sent the reply that she did...Dude...Anyway, you know how I feel about the "hiding" thing, so I don't need to repeat it on the i-net, but I'm really sorry you got hurt like this. You need some laughter. Although Jenn doesn't feel my site's worth the bandwidth it's consuming, hop on over for a smile :-)

    W

     
  • At 2/11/2005 09:50:00 AM, Frank White said:;

    A couple of things, and then I'll be going back to my so-called-life.

    First, just like everyone else, I thought you were over reacting. Then again, I told you so over the phone. Reading your blog however, leads me to believe that Gingerale has some serious deep rooted issues with someone not of her race, especially someone who is African American. Is she upset that you "stole" her friend from her? Does she simply not acknowledge your existence a.k.a. Sixth Sense-ing you? Or are you just "that nigger" that Angel seems to have completely fallen in love with, blindly, she might add, to the point she doesn't see your skin color, all she sees is Mr. Lamb, and that isn't how you go through life, you must keep your eyes closed to outsiders, I mean, we as "Candasians" can't be bothered to someone who is outside our race, and really, what can this "nigger" do for you? Who knows? Who gives a flying fuck? Don't let Gingerale have you questioning yourself about your own paranoia. She'll still have that wedding to have, and when she finally gets divorced within 6 months of marriage, you'll be happy to send her that wedding invitation of your own, simply stating that you and Angel are getting married and your presence is not needed. Thanks.

    The other thing I wanted to say is that although The Squad has fallen to the wayside, you still have me, and besides, I've been here since day one. I'm your brother, reguardless of who says what. Frank White is out. I have a ho to go pimp.

    I'm Frank White, BITCH!

     
  • At 4/10/2005 08:41:00 AM, Pierre Duez said:;

    Hi James, this is Pierre Duez (thank you for using my full name, btw.).

    I was just directed to your blog (and this entry in particular).

    Uhm... wow.

    Given that you have never met Gingerale, I find it difficult to understand how you can feel justified to write such hateful things about her. Feeling hurt for being left out of the party -- fine, I can understand that. But making fun of the lifestyle, the preferences, the personality and anything else about someone you've only heard about through Angel (and I can't help but wonder whether she's given a distorted picture, or whether you just haven't listened... I mean, c'mon: "friendly competition and antagonistic competitors"? Sure, it sounds nice. But where in blazes did you get that notion? What does it even *mean*?) is downright petty.

    Granted, most of what you wrote is beneath comment. Extrapolating from one data point is a dangerous thing... especially when that single datum is grossly skewed and biased. To answer your charges of racism, though easy, would be tantamount to tokenism. And I'm not going to resort to that. (But to give you an idea of the numbers, Martha has 12 friends coming -- INCLUDING two significant others, whom she has known for at least 2 years. Size is definitely the deciding factor in this case, no matter how you choose to spin that.)

    If you want to talk more about this, I welcome an email -- pierreduez@gmail.com

    Jenn, I'm surprised -- and dismayed -- to see (through James) what you think of Martha and me; I had no idea, and am sorry that our friendship has always been such a negative factor and an imposition. From what James says, it sounds like you're only going to come to the wedding so that you don't *not* come (if that makes any sense). I had sincerely hoped that you wanted to come in order to wish two friends well; if it's a protest attendance, though, you should probably save yourself the money. (If I'm wrong on this count, then I definitely hope that you'll still attend!)

     
  • At 4/11/2005 08:48:00 AM, Anonymous said:;

    Or perhaps, you self-important yutz, she just wants to keep her reception small. I've been to several receptions where I left my partner at home, not because she was unwelcome, but because I was particularly close to one or the other. You should remember too, that at the bottom line, it's a matter of the $$ shelled out by the bride and groom.

    If you're half as egotistical IRL as you sound in this post I wouldn't want you at my wedding either. And it wouldn't be because of some underlying racially biased conspiracy. It would be because you are, quite simply put, an asshole. If you possess an objective perspective, which I doubt, try it on for a second and reread what you've written here.
    Out of one side of your mouth you decry racism, but then you spout bigoted bullshit yourself as if it's somehow justified.

    Way to perpetuate the problem.

     
  • At 5/17/2005 08:49:00 PM, Anonymous said:;

    Ha ha ha ha!

    LOSER!

    You get dogged by your woman and you dogged her friends.

    Way to alienate yourself AGAIN. No wonder you're confused about who you are.

    Keep it real, homey!

    REAL STUPID!

     
  • At 4/17/2006 04:05:00 PM, nina won glisson said:;

    omg, i can't believe the negativity of some of your commenters.

    anywho, i was perusing your blog and i will leave my two cents (on a topic over a year old), having just orchestrated my own wedding, i can give you some insight on wedding ettiquette. it is considered bad form for her to have not invited you (no matter the size of the wedding) because she is inviting one half of a couple. it is okay to not allow someone to have a "date" but it is bad etiquette to single out one person in a couple(and long term relationships fall under this category). i made it a point to address my invitations to my friends and their serious boyfriends/girlfriends. it was correct etiquette for your gf to enquire about bringing a guest not on the invitation. it just sucked that she even had to pose it as a question.

    overall, bad form on their part. you had a right to be offended.

     
  • At 9/08/2006 11:36:00 PM, Anonymous said:;

    Thank you!
    [url=http://sbxjexwl.com/daxd/gilg.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://zewyjqcj.com/mkim/btsh.html]Cool site[/url]

     
  • At 9/08/2006 11:36:00 PM, Anonymous said:;

    Good design!
    My homepage | Please visit

     
  • At 9/08/2006 11:36:00 PM, Anonymous said:;

    Well done!
    http://sbxjexwl.com/daxd/gilg.html | http://ynxubsij.com/ehrm/yzua.html

     

Post a Comment

Astonishing Panorama of the Endtimes


Scabs, Guts and Peanut Butter

Powered by Blogger